Not the Dorks

To start, I know that this is a different movie franchise than we’ve named our next episode after, but I’m more of a Star Wars nerd than a Trekkie and the theme of this blog fits this scene better anyway. I started to think about this post the week before last and was noodling on it while on vacation with the family in East Tennessee. With no phone service and no internet, it was easy to turn off the worries of all my data being stolen that built up after our last episode. So I’m going to spit out the thoughts that I loosely put together while hiking through the Appalachian Mountains this past week. Hopefully they come out as clear as the air and water.

Seriously, how beautiful is this?

Seriously, how beautiful is this?

The seed for this came from a post on LinkedIn by Kyle Snyder calling it my (Travis) podcast. I’m thrilled he found the episode and us valuable enough to share with his network, but it got me thinking again of how we got to where we are.

I guess we are, kind of.

I guess we are, kind of.

That’s where this scene comes back into play. The Construction DorkCast has hijacked the Dork moniker that applies to many of us across this industry. If you go back to our third episode, DJ gets the credit for naming us all on The ConTech Crew. It’s a title we’ve all embraced and run with. Some more than others.

What I’m trying to get at is I am not the Construction Dork. We are not the Construction Dorks. This title should be worn like a badge of honor by scores of Con Techies fighting the good fight across the world to bring construction firmly and irreversibly into the digital age. In that sense, we are indeed the dorks, but I want to welcome others to stand up. To shout it out. To be counted.

This is your community. It is one we have created a blog and podcast to represent, but we do it with great honor, deep reverence, and immense respect. We do our very best to protect the image and ideals of the dork community. We are merely a small part of it all. Doing our best to represent our band of nerds, share information, and have a few laughs.

All that said, I’d like to see just how many of you count yourself among the Dorks. I am asking that you fill out the form below and create a post on LinkedIn or Twitter with a video stating your name and that you are indeed a Construction Dork. Add the hashtag ConstructionDorks and we will do our very best to repost and share. Let’s get this community even bigger and stronger. Let’s connect new dorks with old dorks. Make new friends. Figure out how to best digitally network and share during the times of the Rona.

You down with LOD, Yeah you know me

It is way past time to talk about LOD...

One of the things that you understand when you build models is that they can always be better.  There's always something to fix, modify, extend, and maybe the only thing worse than figuring out how far to go is figuring out where the last person to work on the model decided to stop.  With most work still being delivered from team to team during the design and construction process, how do we determine that we're giving the next team the best chance at success? With the ability to add thousands of parameters to our BIM, how do we decide which of those adds value? 

I've struggled for years with the fact that most of the time, the model elements I receive just get erased.  There is often not so much of an evolution of design as a complete redesign using better components and an understanding of the true means and methods of construction or even manufacturing that will be used to build. The model doesn't so much progress as it is replaced by one that more closely matches the reality of what will be built. As an MEP contractor, finding even a single object within the final design that was present during level 100, 200, or even 300 is a rare thing.  This is why the move from LOD 300 to 400 or to the infamous 500 often takes longer than all the other levels combined.  

Mmmmmm….coffee

Mmmmmm….coffee

Worse than that, often the previous design team has spent a large amount of extra time on achieving their LOD that may be of limited or even zero value. I've gotten to hear people stand up, take a bow for a level 300 model that is "clash-free" after months, or even a year of intense work. The problem is that this model cannot be used to build the final product. Their objects will need to be replaced with actual objects of the right size and type to support the actual means and methods, and thousands of clashes will result from these necessary changes.  Did having Clash detection at that level 300 really help? I would say that most of the time, the answer is a resounding No! 

In this podcast, we will take a deep dive into what LOD is and how it might be improved to make it valuable to all the stakeholders. Join us as we talk to people throughout the AEC  process about LOD the realities, the successes, and the struggles.

Join Jonathan, Trent, Myles, and Cliff as they breakdown this topic. Remember, the live episode is interactive so be prepared to bring your opinions as well as your favorite beverage.

Register Here

The Evolution of the Dork-a-Thon

I’ve detailed somewhat how the idea of having a Construction Dorks came together in a previous blog post but, now that it has become a thing, I thought I should detail out a how it started and how we got to where we are and what the event will look like. I hope that reading this and seeing the additional info that will be coming as we approach the date (December 11) will inspire you to want to take part (register at constructiondorks.com).

The Dorks had a humble beginning. I still attribute DJ Phipps as the originator of the moniker. It seemed to fit those of us in the newly minted Construction Technologist role in the industry and many of us have latched onto it. Embracing our slightly “off” personalities, having fun with the title, building a tight community that promotes and helps each other as we navigate this new and exciting path. I might argue at times that we would probably more identify as Nerds if we were to consult the Venn diagram. I would venture to say most of us are fairly intelligent and only slightly socially inept while also passionately obsessed, but I digress.

Who doesn’t love a Venn Diagram?

Who doesn’t love a Venn Diagram?

The concept of a gathering of the Dorks began when we would all run into each other at various trade shows and industry events and talk. We would talk about how it would be nice to break away from all of the sessions and exhibits and have an event where we all just talked and shared ideas of how to work within this new role and how to help each other bring success to our organizations as we go through this digital transformation.

That is how the idea of getting the Dorks together started to gain traction and gather momentum. I began working different connections to see what was possible. One thing I kept coming back to with the Dorks was passion for the industry first, technology second. This is a theme that kept coming up in conversations. With that in mind, the idea of the Dork-a-thon transformed from focusing on how we might share some conversations around using tech to improve our workflows to how can we use our collective brainpower and passion to drive the industry forward beyond just a digital transformation.

Also, during that time I’ve had the opportunity to experience Design Thinking events as well as reading on different types of ideation and inspiring innovation. I also have been talking with a few other people with a similar bent on doing more than just implementing technology, wanting to implement true, pivotal change. With that in mind, I wanted to publish a blog that spoke in depth to the purpose and structure of the Dork-a-thon that we’ve been envisioning, and I have been pushing to make a reality.

That’s when I started to toy around with the idea of having roundtable discussions facilitated by someone from the industry. Those sessions are DfMA, Analog Workflows in Digital World, Contract Documents vs Shop Drawings, drawing from the CPC CDX Challenges, or for those interested to offer their own. The early returns have DfMA as the most sought after topic, then Analog Workflows, then a few compelling “Others”. I plan on keeping offers for facilitators open until the end of October. At that time, 6–8 sessions will be chosen based on interest and the number of registrations we receive.

We will contact the facilitators of those sessions and start sharing content for them to help them prepare for their groups once we close the facilitator submissions. The idea is to apply some accelerated design thinking and lean methodologies in roundtable groups of 6–8 participants through the morning part of the day. Each group focusing primarily on the “Anchors and Rockets” of their topic. What we are looking for are the things that we feel are going well (Rockets) in our industry so we can find ways to strengthen and promote them as well as identify the challenges (Anchors) keeping us from progressing forward.

<Insert Rocket Noise Here>

<Insert Rocket Noise Here>

At the end of the morning session, we will look to have a working lunch where each group presents their findings on Anchors and Rockets, allowing the rest of us the provide input on what the group has found. The goal after these presentations is for our inaugural event to provide to the industry some real, actionable insights going into 2020 to continue to drive positive changes.

Now, we’re all tech geeks and much of the interest in this event is some time for nerds to talk with nerds. I’m hoping to have networking type breaks between, but also allow for two hours at the end of the day for those able and interested in sticking through the afternoon for us to have some short sessions centering on the struggles and successes we’ve had in implementing technology. An important note on these sessions, while they may be lead or include individuals from the technology side, there will be no selling or promoting of particular solutions. We’re not looking for anyone to sell their programs or platforms, but help others learn how they can get better adoption of technologies and new workflows.

I have been approached from many different sectors of our industry and told there is a great deal of interest in what we will do here. I can’t say we are going to change the world, but we have a great opportunity to press forward true transformation in our beloved industry and the organizations we passionately serve. My goal is that this will be the first of many such events. Perhaps we can have mini Dorks meetups throughout the year coupled with other conferences where those gathered can keep moving the ball forward and then we can gather once more at the end of the year and report on how far we’ve come and work to bring another set of Anchors and Rockets for the industry.

To close this, I’d like to make a call out for the Dorks to share this event with their Dork friends. We have a fair amount of interest from within the ‘C’ of AECO as well as from tech, but really want all stakeholders represented. If you think there are like-minded individuals that would bring value in these discussions, please share this post and the website with them. In the coming days, I will be updating the website so that it contains more information on the day of the event and provide more detail as it becomes more formalized.